≡ Menu

The BSA’s New Candlemakers

The Business Software Alliance  (BSA) is at it again.   They are claiming that new UK Cabinet Office policy in favor of open standards — the kind of standards that the web is built on and which has created billions in new economy jobs —  is actually a bad thing, since it would (according to the BSA), “reduce choice, hinder innovation and increase the costs of e-government”.

Really?  Are they serious?

Those with a penchant for the history of economic thought may recall the 19th century French liberal economist Claude Frédéric Bastiat and his satirical economic parables, which attacked prevalent economic errors of his time.  We have need of Bastiat at this hour, especially his skewering of an entrenched industry’s rent-seeking push for government protection from lower cost competitors.  His attack on protectionism was called “The Candlemaker’s Petition“, and a portion of it reads like this:

We are suffering from the ruinous competition of a rival who apparently works under conditions so far superior to our own for the production of light that he is flooding the domestic market with it at an incredibly low price; for the moment he appears, our sales cease, all the consumers turn to him, and a branch of French industry whose ramifications are innumerable is all at once reduced to complete stagnation. This rival, which is none other than the sun, is waging war on us so mercilessly we suspect he is being stirred up against us by perfidious Albion (excellent diplomacy nowadays!), particularly because he has for that haughty island a respect that he does not show for us.

We ask you to be so good as to pass a law requiring the closing of all windows, dormers, skylights, inside and outside shutters, curtains, casements, bull’s-eyes, deadlights, and blinds — in short, all openings, holes, chinks, and fissures through which the light of the sun is wont to enter houses, to the detriment of the fair industries with which, we are proud to say, we have endowed the country, a country that cannot, without betraying ingratitude, abandon us today to so unequal a combat.

Bastiat then goes on to enumerate the benefits that would ensue, if only the government would shut out the sun:

First, if you shut off as much as possible all access to natural light, and thereby create a need for artificial light, what industry in France will not ultimately be encouraged?

If France consumes more tallow, there will have to be more cattle and sheep, and, consequently, we shall see an increase in cleared fields, meat, wool, leather, and especially manure, the basis of all agricultural wealth.

If France consumes more oil, we shall see an expansion in the cultivation of the poppy, the olive, and rapeseed. These rich yet soil-exhausting plants will come at just the right time to enable us to put to profitable use the increased fertility that the breeding of cattle will impart to the land.

Our moors will be covered with resinous trees. Numerous swarms of bees will gather from our mountains the perfumed treasures that today waste their fragrance, like the flowers from which they emanate. Thus, there is not one branch of agriculture that would not undergo a great expansion.

The same holds true of shipping. Thousands of vessels will engage in whaling, and in a short time we shall have a fleet capable of upholding the honour of France and of gratifying the patriotic aspirations of the undersigned petitioners, chandlers, etc.

But what shall we say of the specialities of Parisian manufacture? Henceforth you will behold gilding, bronze, and crystal in candlesticks, in lamps, in chandeliers, in candelabra sparkling in spacious emporia compared with which those of today are but stalls.

There is no needy resin-collector on the heights of his sand dunes, no poor miner in the depths of his black pit, who will not receive higher wages and enjoy increased prosperity.

It needs but a little reflection, gentlemen, to be convinced that there is perhaps not one Frenchman, from the wealthy stockholder of the Anzin Company to the humblest vendor of matches, whose condition would not be improved by the success of our petition.

“…and especially manure” .  Times have not changed much, have they?  I am so glad that IBM is no longer a BSA member.

{ 5 comments… add one }
  • Carlo Piana 2011/03/04, 03:22

    Excellent, excellent! Didn’t know this writing, will use it extensively from now on.

  • Jakub Narębski 2011/03/05, 04:59

    On first blush the requirement of using “open standards” seems like it restrict competition, because restricting choice. But it is enough to think about continuation, be it continuation of support, renewing license, or adding new features that one can see that by not requiring open standards we encourage vendor lock-in, therefore significantly reducing competition on subsequent bids.

  • GaryM 2011/03/24, 11:25

    It was an unexpected pleasure to see Bastiat mentioned here. As soon as I saw the headline in my RSS feed I thought of his article.

Leave a Comment