<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ODF Lies and Whispers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/06/odf-lies-and-whispers.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/06/odf-lies-and-whispers.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=odf-lies-and-whispers</link>
	<description>Thinking the unthinkable, pondering the imponderable, effing the ineffable and scruting the inscrutable</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 11:20:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daily Links 06/12/2009 (p.m.) &#124; Archived Blog &#124; Bob Sutor</title>
		<link>http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/06/odf-lies-and-whispers.html#comment-2584</link>
		<dc:creator>Daily Links 06/12/2009 (p.m.) &#124; Archived Blog &#124; Bob Sutor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 15:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/06/odf-lies-and-whispers.html#comment-2584</guid>
		<description>[...] An Antic Disposition: ODF Lies and Whispers [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] An Antic Disposition: ODF Lies and Whispers [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomS</title>
		<link>http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/06/odf-lies-and-whispers.html#comment-2381</link>
		<dc:creator>TomS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 01:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/06/odf-lies-and-whispers.html#comment-2381</guid>
		<description>In the interest of posterity, thanks for documenting the issues. Your patience is amazing and appreciated.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;a minor spall chucker correction:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;i&gt;Line reads&lt;/i&gt; &quot;completed that &lt;b&gt;reivew&lt;/b&gt; (August 22nd)&quot;&lt;br /&gt;change &lt;i&gt;reivew&lt;/i&gt; --&gt; review</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the interest of posterity, thanks for documenting the issues. Your patience is amazing and appreciated.</p>
<p>a minor spall chucker correction:<br /><i>Line reads</i> &quot;completed that <b>reivew</b> (August 22nd)&quot;<br />change <i>reivew</i> &#8211;&gt; review</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Răzvan Sandu</title>
		<link>http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/06/odf-lies-and-whispers.html#comment-2360</link>
		<dc:creator>Răzvan Sandu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/06/odf-lies-and-whispers.html#comment-2360</guid>
		<description>IMHO, what we really miss is a Windows piece of code (both graphical &amp; command line) that will MASS TRANSFORM Microsoft documents into valid ODF ones.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The wizard present in OpenOffice.org is a good start, but not enough. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;My opinion is that only by &quot;flooding&quot; the market with correctly-formated ODF documents, dimishing the Microsoft quota, we will drive interoperability (because we will create *business concern* for being interoperable)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMHO, what we really miss is a Windows piece of code (both graphical &amp; command line) that will MASS TRANSFORM Microsoft documents into valid ODF ones.</p>
<p>The wizard present in OpenOffice.org is a good start, but not enough. </p>
<p>My opinion is that only by &quot;flooding&quot; the market with correctly-formated ODF documents, dimishing the Microsoft quota, we will drive interoperability (because we will create *business concern* for being interoperable)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bern</title>
		<link>http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/06/odf-lies-and-whispers.html#comment-2359</link>
		<dc:creator>Bern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 04:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/06/odf-lies-and-whispers.html#comment-2359</guid>
		<description>@Purple library guy:  Yes, I would say that OOXML *is* much more vulnerable to criticism over the fact that there are zero implementations.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, if you read the Wikipedia article on OOXML, you&#039;ll note that it quite neatly conflates OOXML, ISO/IEC 29500:2008, and &quot;Microsoft Office 2007 file format&quot;.  So one gains the impression that OOXML is not only ISO-approved, but supported *everywhere*!  I mean, even OpenOffice.org is listed as opening OOXML files!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So another side to the same FUD story, really.  Especially when you look at the list of &quot;supporting applications&quot; in each article.  The ODF article has thirteen apps in a dot-point list.  The corresponding OOXML list has no less than 48 entries.  So reading the Wikipedia articles, you get a somewhat skewed impression of the support for each of the formats.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Curiously, the reference cited for stating that Office 2007 SP2 supports ODF, is a link to an ODF Alliance fact sheet listing all the things that are &lt;i&gt;wrong&lt;/i&gt; with the Office 2007 implementation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Reading the edit history for the articles is kind of fascinating, in a train-wreck kind of way...  :-P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Purple library guy:  Yes, I would say that OOXML *is* much more vulnerable to criticism over the fact that there are zero implementations.</p>
<p>However, if you read the Wikipedia article on OOXML, you&#39;ll note that it quite neatly conflates OOXML, ISO/IEC 29500:2008, and &quot;Microsoft Office 2007 file format&quot;.  So one gains the impression that OOXML is not only ISO-approved, but supported *everywhere*!  I mean, even OpenOffice.org is listed as opening OOXML files!</p>
<p>So another side to the same FUD story, really.  Especially when you look at the list of &quot;supporting applications&quot; in each article.  The ODF article has thirteen apps in a dot-point list.  The corresponding OOXML list has no less than 48 entries.  So reading the Wikipedia articles, you get a somewhat skewed impression of the support for each of the formats.</p>
<p>Curiously, the reference cited for stating that Office 2007 SP2 supports ODF, is a link to an ODF Alliance fact sheet listing all the things that are <i>wrong</i> with the Office 2007 implementation.</p>
<p>Reading the edit history for the articles is kind of fascinating, in a train-wreck kind of way&#8230;  :-P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/06/odf-lies-and-whispers.html#comment-2358</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/06/odf-lies-and-whispers.html#comment-2358</guid>
		<description>The manipulations he did on the opendoc-pages are speaking for themself.&lt;br /&gt;I would suggest to just revert his manipulations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The manipulations he did on the opendoc-pages are speaking for themself.<br />I would suggest to just revert his manipulations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob_sutor</title>
		<link>http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/06/odf-lies-and-whispers.html#comment-2357</link>
		<dc:creator>bob_sutor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/06/odf-lies-and-whispers.html#comment-2357</guid>
		<description>Has Wikipedia itself been notified of how it is being manipulated here? I think having multiple people let them know of the problems might help.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bob Sutor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has Wikipedia itself been notified of how it is being manipulated here? I think having multiple people let them know of the problems might help.</p>
<p>Bob Sutor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/06/odf-lies-and-whispers.html#comment-2356</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 18:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/06/odf-lies-and-whispers.html#comment-2356</guid>
		<description>@Ian,  well that stumps me.  I thought I understood what conflict of interest was.  But I guess I do not.  Is it really permissible for a person to edit an article which tells the history of events in which they were a direct, active and leading participant?  Unbelievable.  If I want to read autobiography  I&#039;ll go to the bookstore, not Wikipedia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ian,  well that stumps me.  I thought I understood what conflict of interest was.  But I guess I do not.  Is it really permissible for a person to edit an article which tells the history of events in which they were a direct, active and leading participant?  Unbelievable.  If I want to read autobiography  I&#39;ll go to the bookstore, not Wikipedia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/06/odf-lies-and-whispers.html#comment-2355</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/06/odf-lies-and-whispers.html#comment-2355</guid>
		<description>Looks like Alex has been editing this article too:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standardization_of_Office_Open_XML&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;List of all his contributions here:&lt;br /&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&amp;limit=500&amp;target=Alexbrn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like Alex has been editing this article too:</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standardization_of_Office_Open_XML" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standardization_of_Office_Open_XML</a></p>
<p>List of all his contributions here:<br /><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&#038;limit=500&#038;target=Alexbrn" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&#038;limit=500&#038;target=Alexbrn</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/06/odf-lies-and-whispers.html#comment-2354</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 02:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/06/odf-lies-and-whispers.html#comment-2354</guid>
		<description>@Nick, I&#039;m not going to reveal my sources, but if you have a good reason for needing this information, send it to me in an email, and I&#039;ll pass it on to my source and them decide whether to respond.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;@Anonymous,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Have you seen OfficeShots.org?  They are attempting to provide the ability to see how the same document would appear when loaded in the various ODF editors.  There is some talk of also having it run the ODF Online Validator against the document as well.  So I think that gets us a bit closer.  If you also had a database of known interoperability problems, and what applications exhibit them, then you could give a report for a given document: &quot;Will work in OpenOffice 3.1, Symphony 1.3, KOffice 2.0, but will lose formulas in MS Office 2007 SP2&quot;.  In theory this is possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Nick, I&#39;m not going to reveal my sources, but if you have a good reason for needing this information, send it to me in an email, and I&#39;ll pass it on to my source and them decide whether to respond.</p>
<p>@Anonymous,</p>
<p>Have you seen OfficeShots.org?  They are attempting to provide the ability to see how the same document would appear when loaded in the various ODF editors.  There is some talk of also having it run the ODF Online Validator against the document as well.  So I think that gets us a bit closer.  If you also had a database of known interoperability problems, and what applications exhibit them, then you could give a report for a given document: &quot;Will work in OpenOffice 3.1, Symphony 1.3, KOffice 2.0, but will lose formulas in MS Office 2007 SP2&quot;.  In theory this is possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/06/odf-lies-and-whispers.html#comment-2353</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/06/odf-lies-and-whispers.html#comment-2353</guid>
		<description>What resources are available for testing how well a document complies to ODF standards?  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If a Free (freedom) suite of program(s) is available, how hard would it for the program to identify the items that are outside the standard?  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Could such a suite of programs then take the conformance + non-conformance profile, and estimate its likely origin?  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And for the really tricky part, could such a suite of programs estimate how well such a document might fare if imported into a specified version of a specified program?  (For example, note what extensions in a document would be ignored by the application.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What resources are available for testing how well a document complies to ODF standards?  </p>
<p>If a Free (freedom) suite of program(s) is available, how hard would it for the program to identify the items that are outside the standard?  </p>
<p>Could such a suite of programs then take the conformance + non-conformance profile, and estimate its likely origin?  </p>
<p>And for the really tricky part, could such a suite of programs estimate how well such a document might fare if imported into a specified version of a specified program?  (For example, note what extensions in a document would be ignored by the application.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/06/odf-lies-and-whispers.html#comment-2352</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 22:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/06/odf-lies-and-whispers.html#comment-2352</guid>
		<description>There’s one issue on the ODF support in Office 2007 I don’t think anyone has really discussed – and it’s the issue that annoys me the most.  I am working for an organisation that wants to provide interoperability between Office 2007, OpenOffice.org and other Office suites using the ODF file format.  All we want is interoperability.  As has been discussed ad nauseam the ODF support in SP2 does not provide that, so we can’t use it.  However, there are so many other fixes included in SP2 that I have no choice but to install it and there is no way for me to disable or deactivate the “support” in SP2.  And that’s my issue!  We have happily been using the Sun ODF Plug-in, but now it has basically been rendered useless. Yes, there are convoluted ways to use the Sun Plug in with SP2 (http://blogs.sun.com/malte/entry/using_the_sun_odf_plugin), but that doesn’t cut it for the ordinary users – they double click on stuff.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If Microsoft wants to implement inoperable ODF support, it’s really their choice. The issue is that I as a consumer cannot choose not to use their support and opt for a competitor’s.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I want to use the Sun ODF Plug-in, so Microsoft, please give me a way to get rid of yours!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There’s one issue on the ODF support in Office 2007 I don’t think anyone has really discussed – and it’s the issue that annoys me the most.  I am working for an organisation that wants to provide interoperability between Office 2007, OpenOffice.org and other Office suites using the ODF file format.  All we want is interoperability.  As has been discussed ad nauseam the ODF support in SP2 does not provide that, so we can’t use it.  However, there are so many other fixes included in SP2 that I have no choice but to install it and there is no way for me to disable or deactivate the “support” in SP2.  And that’s my issue!  We have happily been using the Sun ODF Plug-in, but now it has basically been rendered useless. Yes, there are convoluted ways to use the Sun Plug in with SP2 (<a href="http://blogs.sun.com/malte/entry/using_the_sun_odf_plugin" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.sun.com/malte/entry/using_the_sun_odf_plugin</a>), but that doesn’t cut it for the ordinary users – they double click on stuff.</p>
<p>If Microsoft wants to implement inoperable ODF support, it’s really their choice. The issue is that I as a consumer cannot choose not to use their support and opt for a competitor’s.  </p>
<p>I want to use the Sun ODF Plug-in, so Microsoft, please give me a way to get rid of yours!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Demou</title>
		<link>http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/06/odf-lies-and-whispers.html#comment-2351</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Demou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 21:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/06/odf-lies-and-whispers.html#comment-2351</guid>
		<description>&gt; Here are some of the points made by this large&lt;br /&gt;&gt; company in a letter&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Is there any independent confirmation that all those false claims were made by Microsoft? (Not because I don&#039;t trust Rob but because I want to be able to use information from this article to argue with people that don&#039;t trust him)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; Here are some of the points made by this large<br />&gt; company in a letter</p>
<p>Is there any independent confirmation that all those false claims were made by Microsoft? (Not because I don&#39;t trust Rob but because I want to be able to use information from this article to argue with people that don&#39;t trust him)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/06/odf-lies-and-whispers.html#comment-2350</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/06/odf-lies-and-whispers.html#comment-2350</guid>
		<description>I think this post captures the current state of Wikipedia regarding OpenDocument, etc,&lt;br /&gt;http://www.groklaw.net/comment.php?mode=display&amp;sid=2009061001520015&amp;title=Common%20Wikipedia%20game%20played%20on%20articles&amp;type=article&amp;order=&amp;hideanonymous=0&amp;pid=0#c761075&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Wikipedia is being gamed by Microsoft-linked people that abuse the anonymity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this post captures the current state of Wikipedia regarding OpenDocument, etc,<br /><a href="http://www.groklaw.net/comment.php?mode=display&#038;sid=2009061001520015&#038;title=Common%20Wikipedia%20game%20played%20on%20articles&#038;type=article&#038;order=&#038;hideanonymous=0&#038;pid=0#c761075" rel="nofollow">http://www.groklaw.net/comment.php?mode=display&#038;sid=2009061001520015&#038;title=Common%20Wikipedia%20game%20played%20on%20articles&#038;type=article&#038;order=&#038;hideanonymous=0&#038;pid=0#c761075</a></p>
<p>Wikipedia is being gamed by Microsoft-linked people that abuse the anonymity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Purple library guy</title>
		<link>http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/06/odf-lies-and-whispers.html#comment-2349</link>
		<dc:creator>Purple library guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/06/odf-lies-and-whispers.html#comment-2349</guid>
		<description>Kind of brazen that Microsoft would push claims about no software implementing ODF, since surely OOXML is *much* more vulnerable to that criticism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kind of brazen that Microsoft would push claims about no software implementing ODF, since surely OOXML is *much* more vulnerable to that criticism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rodda</title>
		<link>http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/06/odf-lies-and-whispers.html#comment-2348</link>
		<dc:creator>rodda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/06/odf-lies-and-whispers.html#comment-2348</guid>
		<description>Rob, thanks for keeping us informed on these issues.  However, I would suggest that OASIS or another informed representative take action on the Wikipedia entry.  As you know, the general public uses Wikipedia as a resource for information and the best misrepresentation of facts are those where information is excluded...as in this case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob, thanks for keeping us informed on these issues.  However, I would suggest that OASIS or another informed representative take action on the Wikipedia entry.  As you know, the general public uses Wikipedia as a resource for information and the best misrepresentation of facts are those where information is excluded&#8230;as in this case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/06/odf-lies-and-whispers.html#comment-2347</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/06/odf-lies-and-whispers.html#comment-2347</guid>
		<description>Has anybody contacted this customer to put them right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anybody contacted this customer to put them right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/06/odf-lies-and-whispers.html#comment-2346</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/06/odf-lies-and-whispers.html#comment-2346</guid>
		<description>@Anonymous,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To my knowledge, all major ODF editors will read a conformant ODF 1.0 document today.  Some, like Office 2007 SP2, will do it poorly, but they all should handle it, since ODF 1.0 is a subset of ODF 1.1 and ODF 1.2.  You can try this with OpenOffice and Symphony and KOffice, for example, giving it an ODF 1.0 document as input.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Additionally, some applications like Google Docs write out documents with the ODF 1.0 version attribute set.  So we have at least one editor that provides read/write support for ODF 1.0.  My tests show that it can also import ODF 1.1 documents.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Finally, you can still freely download and use earlier versions of OpenOffice, etc., that write out ODF 1.0 files by default, if that is your need.  Whether this use is &quot;supported&quot; depends on your support contract, e.g., what deal you might have with Sun on earlier version of StarOffice, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Anonymous,</p>
<p>To my knowledge, all major ODF editors will read a conformant ODF 1.0 document today.  Some, like Office 2007 SP2, will do it poorly, but they all should handle it, since ODF 1.0 is a subset of ODF 1.1 and ODF 1.2.  You can try this with OpenOffice and Symphony and KOffice, for example, giving it an ODF 1.0 document as input.</p>
<p>Additionally, some applications like Google Docs write out documents with the ODF 1.0 version attribute set.  So we have at least one editor that provides read/write support for ODF 1.0.  My tests show that it can also import ODF 1.1 documents.</p>
<p>Finally, you can still freely download and use earlier versions of OpenOffice, etc., that write out ODF 1.0 files by default, if that is your need.  Whether this use is &quot;supported&quot; depends on your support contract, e.g., what deal you might have with Sun on earlier version of StarOffice, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/06/odf-lies-and-whispers.html#comment-2345</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 08:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/06/odf-lies-and-whispers.html#comment-2345</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://digg.com/tech_news/The_anti_ODF_campaign_continues&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Submitted to Digg.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://digg.com/tech_news/The_anti_ODF_campaign_continues" rel="nofollow">Submitted to Digg.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/06/odf-lies-and-whispers.html#comment-2344</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 07:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/06/odf-lies-and-whispers.html#comment-2344</guid>
		<description>Rob keep up the good work. I am amazed how much one has to be on the ball as regards Microsoft. It shows how desperate a company is when they have to write the article to criticise  something so they can refer to it as fact. I used to think Wikipedia was good too until I found out anyone can edit an article. It may be good as a reference but it certainly is not fact. So it is easy with Wikipedia to discredit someone or something as this shows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob keep up the good work. I am amazed how much one has to be on the ball as regards Microsoft. It shows how desperate a company is when they have to write the article to criticise  something so they can refer to it as fact. I used to think Wikipedia was good too until I found out anyone can edit an article. It may be good as a reference but it certainly is not fact. So it is easy with Wikipedia to discredit someone or something as this shows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/06/odf-lies-and-whispers.html#comment-2343</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 07:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/06/odf-lies-and-whispers.html#comment-2343</guid>
		<description>&quot;No software that current implements ODF as approved by ISO&quot; - your rebuttal seems to link to a story about validation, not implementation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Which key apps write out ODF 1.0 files?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;No software that current implements ODF as approved by ISO&quot; &#8211; your rebuttal seems to link to a story about validation, not implementation.</p>
<p>Which key apps write out ODF 1.0 files?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.168 seconds -->

