<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beautiful Word Clouds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robweir.com/blog/2008/06/beautiful-word-clouds.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robweir.com/blog/2008/06/beautiful-word-clouds.html</link>
	<description>Thinking the unthinkable, pondering the imponderable, effing the ineffable and scruting the inscrutable</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:56:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Doug Mahugh</title>
		<link>http://www.robweir.com/blog/2008/06/beautiful-word-clouds.html#comment-1999</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Mahugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 05:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robweir.com/blog/2008/06/beautiful-word-clouds.html#comment-1999</guid>
		<description>These Wordle summaries are cool.  I like the way they summarize the concepts in a large document and provide a high-level overview that&#039;s often pretty accurate.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;For example, if you look at the words in the &quot;Moby Dick&quot; image and that sounds interesting to you at first glance, there&#039;s a good change you&#039;ll find the book interesting on some level.  If not, you probably won&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These Wordle summaries are cool.  I like the way they summarize the concepts in a large document and provide a high-level overview that&#8217;s often pretty accurate.</p>
<p>For example, if you look at the words in the &#8220;Moby Dick&#8221; image and that sounds interesting to you at first glance, there&#8217;s a good change you&#8217;ll find the book interesting on some level.  If not, you probably won&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.robweir.com/blog/2008/06/beautiful-word-clouds.html#comment-1996</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 01:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robweir.com/blog/2008/06/beautiful-word-clouds.html#comment-1996</guid>
		<description>Stemming algorithms usually have enough language smarts to avoid things like that.  They are looking for grammatical endings like -ing, -ly, etc., and conflating words with these suffixes with their roots.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;For quick and dirty processing, I&#039;ve always used the Porter Stemmer, which I see now is &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://tartarus.org/~martin/PorterStemmer/&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;online&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stemming algorithms usually have enough language smarts to avoid things like that.  They are looking for grammatical endings like -ing, -ly, etc., and conflating words with these suffixes with their roots.</p>
<p>For quick and dirty processing, I&#8217;ve always used the Porter Stemmer, which I see now is <a HREF="http://tartarus.org/~martin/PorterStemmer/" REL="nofollow" rel="nofollow">online</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.robweir.com/blog/2008/06/beautiful-word-clouds.html#comment-1995</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robweir.com/blog/2008/06/beautiful-word-clouds.html#comment-1995</guid>
		<description>I see trouble with a stemming algorithm - would it think &quot;XML&quot; and &quot;OOXML&quot; were the same word? Scary thought... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see trouble with a stemming algorithm &#8211; would it think &#8220;XML&#8221; and &#8220;OOXML&#8221; were the same word? Scary thought&#8230; :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.robweir.com/blog/2008/06/beautiful-word-clouds.html#comment-1993</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robweir.com/blog/2008/06/beautiful-word-clouds.html#comment-1993</guid>
		<description>The answer is:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;1) Moby Dick&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;2) Shakespeare&#039;s Sonnets (here I increased the words shown to 1000, resulting in the denser cloud)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;3) This blog</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The answer is:</p>
<p>1) Moby Dick</p>
<p>2) Shakespeare&#8217;s Sonnets (here I increased the words shown to 1000, resulting in the denser cloud)</p>
<p>3) This blog</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Konrad</title>
		<link>http://www.robweir.com/blog/2008/06/beautiful-word-clouds.html#comment-1992</link>
		<dc:creator>Konrad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 11:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robweir.com/blog/2008/06/beautiful-word-clouds.html#comment-1992</guid>
		<description>shakespeare isn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>shakespeare isn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://www.robweir.com/blog/2008/06/beautiful-word-clouds.html#comment-1991</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 10:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robweir.com/blog/2008/06/beautiful-word-clouds.html#comment-1991</guid>
		<description>The 2nd one looks like Shakespeare to me.  Since there&#039;s no visible character names, I&#039;m guessing that&#039;s the collected sonnets.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Welcome back, Rob.  We missed you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 2nd one looks like Shakespeare to me.  Since there&#8217;s no visible character names, I&#8217;m guessing that&#8217;s the collected sonnets.</p>
<p>Welcome back, Rob.  We missed you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.robweir.com/blog/2008/06/beautiful-word-clouds.html#comment-1990</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 08:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robweir.com/blog/2008/06/beautiful-word-clouds.html#comment-1990</guid>
		<description>Are the second one shakespeare?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are the second one shakespeare?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.robweir.com/blog/2008/06/beautiful-word-clouds.html#comment-1989</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 08:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robweir.com/blog/2008/06/beautiful-word-clouds.html#comment-1989</guid>
		<description>The first is *obviously* Moby Dick.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The second, I think, is Shakespeare&#039;s sonnets.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;And I agree the third is quite possibly Rob&#039;s blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first is *obviously* Moby Dick.</p>
<p>The second, I think, is Shakespeare&#8217;s sonnets.</p>
<p>And I agree the third is quite possibly Rob&#8217;s blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.robweir.com/blog/2008/06/beautiful-word-clouds.html#comment-1988</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 07:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robweir.com/blog/2008/06/beautiful-word-clouds.html#comment-1988</guid>
		<description>If I had to guess on the second one, I would say Song of Solomon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I had to guess on the second one, I would say Song of Solomon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.robweir.com/blog/2008/06/beautiful-word-clouds.html#comment-1987</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 04:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robweir.com/blog/2008/06/beautiful-word-clouds.html#comment-1987</guid>
		<description>Number 2, William Shakespere, Romeo and Juliet ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Number 2, William Shakespere, Romeo and Juliet ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.robweir.com/blog/2008/06/beautiful-word-clouds.html#comment-1986</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 04:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robweir.com/blog/2008/06/beautiful-word-clouds.html#comment-1986</guid>
		<description>Number 2 looks like Shakespeare sonnets, or possibly John Donne to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Number 2 looks like Shakespeare sonnets, or possibly John Donne to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.robweir.com/blog/2008/06/beautiful-word-clouds.html#comment-1985</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 01:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robweir.com/blog/2008/06/beautiful-word-clouds.html#comment-1985</guid>
		<description>I see Moby Dick and the third is probably this blog.  But what&#039;s the 2nd one?  I want to say the Bible, but it&#039;s missing some obvious words that seem to rule that out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see Moby Dick and the third is probably this blog.  But what&#8217;s the 2nd one?  I want to say the Bible, but it&#8217;s missing some obvious words that seem to rule that out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trader.name</title>
		<link>http://www.robweir.com/blog/2008/06/beautiful-word-clouds.html#comment-1984</link>
		<dc:creator>trader.name</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 22:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robweir.com/blog/2008/06/beautiful-word-clouds.html#comment-1984</guid>
		<description>The first cloud is obviously from &quot;Moby Dick&quot;; the second one appears to be from a collection of Shakespeare&#039;s sonnets.  The third appears to be from a OOXML-vs-ODF rant of some kind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first cloud is obviously from &#8220;Moby Dick&#8221;; the second one appears to be from a collection of Shakespeare&#8217;s sonnets.  The third appears to be from a OOXML-vs-ODF rant of some kind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Raymond</title>
		<link>http://www.robweir.com/blog/2008/06/beautiful-word-clouds.html#comment-1981</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Raymond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robweir.com/blog/2008/06/beautiful-word-clouds.html#comment-1981</guid>
		<description>The word &quot;open&quot; really should be larger in that last cloud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The word &#8220;open&#8221; really should be larger in that last cloud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.459 seconds -->
