<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ODF Freely Available</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robweir.com/blog/2007/03/odf-freely-available.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robweir.com/blog/2007/03/odf-freely-available.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=odf-freely-available</link>
	<description>Thinking the unthinkable, pondering the imponderable, effing the ineffable and scruting the inscrutable</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 11:20:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: orcmid</title>
		<link>http://www.robweir.com/blog/2007/03/odf-freely-available.html#comment-640</link>
		<dc:creator>orcmid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 20:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robweir.com/blog/2007/03/odf-freely-available.html#comment-640</guid>
		<description>I read the restrictions on the use of the freely-available OSI document and decided that it was simply better to use the OASIS version, which has a much simpler copyright and use restriction (and available in an editable form).  I agree that it is nice that the document is available without charge, but it isn&#039;t exactly &quot;free.&quot;  More like ick-free.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;ECMA seems to have carved out a better deal for making ISO versions of their standards freely available as downloads.  Maybe OASIS could arrange the same deal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read the restrictions on the use of the freely-available OSI document and decided that it was simply better to use the OASIS version, which has a much simpler copyright and use restriction (and available in an editable form).  I agree that it is nice that the document is available without charge, but it isn&#8217;t exactly &#8220;free.&#8221;  More like ick-free.  </p>
<p>ECMA seems to have carved out a better deal for making ISO versions of their standards freely available as downloads.  Maybe OASIS could arrange the same deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 2.530 seconds -->

