<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adobe to Standardize PDF</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robweir.com/blog/2007/01/adobe-to-standardize-pdf.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robweir.com/blog/2007/01/adobe-to-standardize-pdf.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=adobe-to-standardize-pdf</link>
	<description>Thinking the unthinkable, pondering the imponderable, effing the ineffable and scruting the inscrutable</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 11:20:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.robweir.com/blog/2007/01/adobe-to-standardize-pdf.html#comment-404</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robweir.com/blog/2007/01/adobe-to-standardize-pdf.html#comment-404</guid>
		<description>Could you provide an example of a non-Adobe program that renders PDF files correctly 100% of the time? By that, I mean with ALL features--forms, encrytion/DRM, scripting, etc.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I have never seen such a program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could you provide an example of a non-Adobe program that renders PDF files correctly 100% of the time? By that, I mean with ALL features&#8211;forms, encrytion/DRM, scripting, etc.</p>
<p>I have never seen such a program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.robweir.com/blog/2007/01/adobe-to-standardize-pdf.html#comment-397</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 13:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robweir.com/blog/2007/01/adobe-to-standardize-pdf.html#comment-397</guid>
		<description>Sure, you could say that.  But you would be wrong.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There are plenty of non-Adobe applications out there that create or render PDF, and these are available on many platforms, proprietary as well as open source.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Also, as I noted, several subsets of PDF, adapted for specific domains, have already been standardized for ISO.  So having the full PDF specification as an ISO standard would complement the existing standards nicely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, you could say that.  But you would be wrong.</p>
<p>There are plenty of non-Adobe applications out there that create or render PDF, and these are available on many platforms, proprietary as well as open source.</p>
<p>Also, as I noted, several subsets of PDF, adapted for specific domains, have already been standardized for ISO.  So having the full PDF specification as an ISO standard would complement the existing standards nicely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.robweir.com/blog/2007/01/adobe-to-standardize-pdf.html#comment-395</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 13:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robweir.com/blog/2007/01/adobe-to-standardize-pdf.html#comment-395</guid>
		<description>Interesting you are applauding Adobe. What are they doing that is different than Microsoft?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;One of the biggest criticisms of OOXML is that it is merely an XML representation of Office binary file formats. Microsoft is, in essence, standardizing its propriety formats.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Yet PDF *is* a proprietary format. It derives from PostScript, which Adobe has had years to work on. It as also complex. In short, you could say that PDF, like OOXML, is a format that nobody aside from its creator could faithfully render.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting you are applauding Adobe. What are they doing that is different than Microsoft?</p>
<p>One of the biggest criticisms of OOXML is that it is merely an XML representation of Office binary file formats. Microsoft is, in essence, standardizing its propriety formats.</p>
<p>Yet PDF *is* a proprietary format. It derives from PostScript, which Adobe has had years to work on. It as also complex. In short, you could say that PDF, like OOXML, is a format that nobody aside from its creator could faithfully render.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.680 seconds -->

