“Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful” said G. E.P. Box of Box-Jenkins fame.  Today we’re going to look at a model of market share, and I hope it is a useful model.  One nice property of it is that it is very easy to estimate the parameters of this model.  A single survey question will do.

This model should be intuitive to various groups, especially financial analysts and space enthusiasts.  The former might recall DuPont analysis of Return on Equity, by which ROE is expressed as a product of business ratios such as margin, turnover and leverage.   And space enthusiasts might recall the Drake equation, which estimates the number of intelligent civilizations in the galaxy, also as a product of various factors, such as the rate of star formation, and average number of planets per star.  Both models are useful, not only for estimating the value of interest, but because the factors themselves have interesting interpretations and tell us something about the system being modeled.

In our model we look at a funnel process that describes the actions that must occur for someone to become a regular user of a product.

market-funnel

We start with the universe of potential customers, everyone who might have a need for your product.

Then the person must be aware of your product. They need to know it exists.

(Note there are other models that start even earlier, that the potential customer must first be aware that they have a need.   For example, those selling medicines go through great lengths to convince people that flaky toe skin is something that requires urgent attention.)

Then the person must be convinced to try your product.   Even free products require some incentive for their time and effort. Why try?  Why now?  Is it safe?   Some will be motivated to try and some will not.

Of those who try, some will have a good experience and continue to use your product, and others will have a bad experience, or insufficiently good experience, and will not continue to use your product.

Those at the end of the funnel who continue to use your product, as a fraction of the total potential market at the top of the funnel, that is your market share.

Where it gets more interesting is when you express this as a product of factors, as in:

Market Share = Customer Awareness * Customer Motivation * Customer Satisfaction

Awareness tells you, of those who are in your market, what portion has heard of your product?  This is a measure of the value of your brand, including advertising and word of mouth.

Motivation tells you, of those who have heard of your product, what portion has even tried it?  This is a measure of the timeliness and fit of your product to the market.  Pricing strategy and promotions/incentives also factor in here.

Customer satisfaction tells you, of those who have tried your product, what portion remain customers?  This is a measure of how well your product meets the promises and expectations laid out in earlier stages of the funnel.

As you can see, the first two factors relate mostly to your brand and marketing efforts, while the last factor, Customer satisfaction, relates to your product.   So by identifying these individual factors you can look at the relative power of your brand and your product.  Do you have a great product that no one knows about?  If that were the case the awareness numbers would be low and the satisfaction numbers would be high.  Are you targeting the wrong users in your marketing efforts?   That would show up as high Motivation scores and low Satisfaction scores.  That could also indicate product quality issues.  There are many different combinations, and the values of these factors, and their trend over time, can tell you much.

Now here is where it gets interesting.   You can estimate all of these factors, Customer Awareness, Customer Motivation and Customer Satisfaction, and Market Share as well,  with a survey of a single question, a question that with responses that match the structure of your funnel.

The question to ask is of the form:

“What is your awareness with the hand cream called Whizzo-Soft?”

A. I have never heard of it.

B. I have heard of it but I have never tried it.

C. I have tried it once.

D. I use it sometimes.

E. I use it regularly.

There are variations on the scale to use, sometimes only four choices, sometimes more, depending on whether you want to make distinctions among occasional versus regular customers.

Note that this requires a real, random survey of your target market.  A poll on your website where visitors self-select will obviously bias the results.   For this to work you really need to survey a random sample of your target market.

Once you have done this the math is easy.  If you have N total responses , and the number of responses for the questions are A ,B, C, D and E, then:

  • Customer Awareness = 1 – A/N
  • Customer Motivation = (C + D + E) / (N -A)
  • Customer Satisfaction = (D + E)/(N – A – B)

In Part 2 of this post, I’ll show a worked out example, including interpretation,  using data from a  recent random survey that looked at OpenOffice and LibreOffice awareness and use.

{ 1 comment }

Mapping the ASF, Part II

May 6, 2013

In my last post I showed you one view of the Apache Software Foundation, the relationship of projects as revealed by the overlapping membership of their Project Management Committees.  After I did that post it struck me that I could, with a very small modifications to my script, look at the connections at the individual [...]

1 comment Read the full article →

Mapping the Apache Software Foundation

May 3, 2013

So, what do we have here?   This is a graph of Apache projects and how they are related, by one definition of “related” in any case.  Click on the image for a larger PNG version, or here if you would like an SVG. Each labeled circle (node) in the graph represents one project at Apache.  [...]

0 comments Read the full article →

A Tale of Two Cities

November 23, 2012

“When a dog bites a man, that is not news, because it happens so often. But if a man bites a dog, that is news.”   That, in the words of John B. Bogart of the New York Sun, is a classic rule of press coverage.  The ordinary is not news.  The expected is not news.  [...]

5 comments Read the full article →

LibreOffice’s Dubious Claims: Part 3, Developers

November 4, 2012

(This post represents my personal opinion only.  The standard disclaimer applies.) In previous posts I looked at claims made by LibreOffice, in project blog posts and press releases, related to the number of LibreOffice users and the number of active LibreOffice contributors.  I showed that in both cases the claims from LibreOffice were greatly inflated [...]

20 comments Read the full article →

LibreOffice’s Dubious Claims: Part 2, Community Size

November 3, 2012

(This post represents my personal opinion only.  The standard disclaimer applies.) In a previous post I looked at how LibreOffice inflates its user and download stats, claiming to have far more users than it actually has.  Several journalists took these claims at face value and repeated them in their articles, never questioning whether LibreOffice representatives [...]

11 comments Read the full article →

LibreOffice’s Dubious Claims: Part I, Download Counts

October 31, 2012

(This post represents my personal opinion only.  The standard disclaimer applies.) Part II is here and Part III is here. The Claims I’ve recently read some implausible claims from the LibreOffice project,  concerning their stats for downloads and users.  (These two different statistics are unfortunately conflated in their publicity campaigns, but more about that later).   [...]

32 comments Read the full article →

From the Whispers of ApacheCon…

October 20, 2012

From the whispers of ApacheCon, OpenOffice.org may never leave the incubator project. The intention may be to do a thorough code audit and produce one last, clean release that the rival LibreOffice can absorb. That was what you may have heard 10 months ago,  if you listened to the rumormongers.   Certainly there were a lot [...]

10 comments Read the full article →

Accounting for Vendor Lock-in

July 12, 2012

I am not an accountant.   However, as a Graham and Dodd value investor over the years, I’ve picked up some of the fundamental principles.   A key one is the Matching Principle, that revenues and expenses should be booked in a way that clarifies the underlying business performance, rather than based purely on the timing of [...]

3 comments Read the full article →

Perspectives on Apache OpenOffice 3.4 download numbers

June 22, 2012

You may have read, on the Apache OpenOffice blog, news that the project has had 5 million downloads in the first 6 weeks since the release of version 3.4.  And as the above chart shows, the download rate has increased in the past two weeks, as we’ve started to roll out the upgrade notifications to [...]

1 comment Read the full article →